Thursday, December 19, 2019
Wednesday, November 6, 2019
Die offiziele faschistische Antwort der Bundespolizei an meiner Beschwerde über die Diskriminierung der Passagieren aus Griechenland in deutschen Flughafen
Ihre Beschwerde vom 25.04.2019 bezüglich der Durchführung „verdachtsunabhängiger Kontrol-
len“ im Flugverkehr von Thessaloniki nach Stuttgart am 25.11.2018 und 05.01.2019 wurde mir
durch das Bundespolizeipräsidium Potsdam zuständigkeitshalber mit der Bitte um Beantwortung
zugeleitet. Nach eingehender Prüfung des sehr ausführlich von Ihnen geschilderten Sachverhal-
tes teile ich Ihnen hierzu Folgendes mit:
Die in Ihrem Beschwerdeschreiben und mehrfach gegenüber den Beamten der Bundespolizei
am Flughafen Stuttgart geäußerte Rechtsauffassung, die am Flughafen Stuttgart erfolgenden
Kontrollmaßnahmen der Bundespolizei im Bereich des Flugverkehrs zwischen Thessaloniki und
Stuttgart würden den Schengener Grenzkodex brechen und seien daher unzulässig, ist unzu-
treffend.
Zwar können die Binnengrenzen zwischen zwei Schengen-Mitgliedstaaten, hierzu gehören auch
die Flughäfen der Mitgliedstaaten für Binnenflüge, nach Maßgabe des Artikels 22 des Schenge-
ner Grenzkodex (SGK) unabhängig von der Staatsangehörigkeit der betreffenden Person ohne
Personenkontrollen, gemeint sind Grenzkontrollen, überschritten werden. Dies bedeutet aller-
dings nicht, dass die zuständigen Behörden des jeweiligen Mitgliedstaates keinerlei Personen-
kontrollen mehr durchführen dürfen. Nach Art. 23 SGK berührt das Ausbleiben der Grenzkon-
trollen an den Binnengrenzen nicht die Ausübung der polizeilichen Befugnisse durch die zustän-
digen Behörden der Mitgliedstaaten nach Maßgabe des nationalen Rechts, sofern die Ausübung
solcher Befugnisse nicht die gleiche Wirkung wie Grenzübertrittskontrollen hat.
Die Zulässigkeit der Kontrolle von aus Schengen-Mitgliedstaaten ankommenden Passagieren
an deutschen Flughäfen durch die Bundespolizei ergibt sich insofern aus Artikel 23 des SGK in
Verbindung mit dem Bundespolizeigesetz (BPolG). Die Sichtung der Dokumente und Befragung
der Passagiere erfolgt auf der Grundlage des § 22 Abs. 1a BPolG. Nach dieser Vorschrift kann
die Bundespolizei zur Verhinderung oder Unterbindung unerlaubter Einreise in das Bundesge-
biet in Zügen und auf dem Gebiet der Bahnanlagen der Eisenbahnen des Bundes (§ 3), soweit
auf Grund von Lageerkenntnissen oder grenzpolizeilicher Erfahrung anzunehmen ist, dass diese
zur unerlaubten Einreise genutzt werden, sowie in einer dem Luftverkehr dienenden Anlage oder
Einrichtung eines Verkehrsflughafens (§ 4) mit grenzüberschreitendem Verkehr jede Person
kurzzeitig anhalten, befragen und verlangen, dass mitgeführte Ausweispapiere oder Grenzüber-
trittspapiere zur Prüfung ausgehändigt werden, sowie mitgeführte Sachen in Augenschein neh-
men.
Die von Ihnen bemängelten Kontrollen am Flughafen Stuttgart sind nach § 22 Abs. 1a BPolG
zulässig, weil auf Grund belegbarer Lageerkenntnisse anzunehmen ist, dass Flüge aus Grie-
chenland auch weiterhin zur unerlaubten Einreise genutzt werden. Es obliegt dem pflichtgemä-
ßem Ermessen der eingesetzten Beamten der Bundespolizei, zu entscheiden, welche Personen
einer entsprechenden Kontrolle unterzogen werden. Daher kann es auch vorkommen, dass alle
Passagiere eines Fluges befragt werden. Die von Ihnen kritisierten Maßnahmen (Personenkon-
trolle, einfache Befragung) am Flughafen Stuttgart entfalten auch nicht die Wirkung von Grenz-
kontrollen, da sie sowohl von Umfang als auch Intensität sehr deutlich hinter Grenzkontrollen
nach Art. 8 SGK zurückbleiben. Die vorübergehend im Binnenflugverkehr mit Griechenland ein-
geführten Grenzkontrollen wurden im Mai 2018 eingestellt. Die von den Beamten der Bundes-
polizei am Flughafen Stuttgart getroffenen Maßnahmen sind, wie vorstehend dargelegt, keine
Grenzkontrollen, sondern solche auf der Grundlage des § 22 Abs. 1a BPolG und daher zulässig.
Ich erlaube mir in diesem Zusammenhang den Hinweis, dass auch Binnenflüge aus anderen
Schengen-Mitgliedstaaten entsprechenden Maßnahmen unterzogen werden, soweit die vorste-
hend geschilderten Voraussetzungen vorliegen.
Dass Sie dies bereits zwei Mal getroffen hat, ist zwar für Sie nachvollziehbar unangenehm,
jedoch rechtlich zulässig.
Die von Ihnen erwähnte Aussage des Beamten, dass die Kontrollen anlässlich der
Migrationskrise durchgeführt werden, ist dahingehend gemeint, dass sie deswegen erfolgen, weil
auf Grund von konkreten Lageerkenntnissen anzunehmen ist, dass diese zur unerlaubten
Einreise genutzt werden. Falsch und unangemessen wäre jedoch die Aussage, dass die
Kontrollen aufgrund des fehlenden Vertrauens zu den griechischen Grenzbehörden durchgeführt
werden. Es besteht seit vielen Jahren eine enge und vertrauensvolle Zusammenarbeit der
Bundespolizei mit den griechischen Grenzbehörden. Insofern möchte ich mich für diese Aussage entschuldigen.
Darüber hinaus gaben die Beamten auf Nachfrage an, dass sich die von Ihnen angesprochenen
Unterhaltung unter den Beamten und deren Lachen am 25.11.2018 sich nicht auf das Gespräch
mit Ihnen bezogen habe, sondern sie sich bereits einem anderen Thema gewidmet hätten. Sie
bestreiten, abfällige Äußerungen Ihnen gegenüber getätigt zu haben. Ich habe alle beteiligten
Beamten nochmals eingehend zu Ihren Vorwürfen befragt. Der anwesende Vorgesetzte der Be-
amten konnte glaubwürdig darlegen, dass kein beteiligter Beamter der Bundespolizei Sie aus-
gelacht bzw. Glossen über Sie gerissen hat. Man habe Ihnen im Verlaufe des Gespräches mehr-
mals versucht, die Rechtsgrundlage und den Zweck der Kontrolle zu erläutern. Auch die beiden
kontrollierenden Beamten haben sich in keiner Weise über Sie lustig gemacht. Der ganze Kon-
trollprozess sei ruhig und sachlich verlaufen. Jedoch hätten Sie sich unzufrieden mit der Kon-
trollsituation und den erläuterten Rechtsgrundlagen gezeigt, was zu einer dann angespannten
Gesprächsatmosphäre geführt habe.
Die Äußerungen über einen „guten Pass“, bezogen sich nicht auf Ihre Person, sondern auf das
vorgelegte Reisedokument. Es ging dabei um die gute Lesbarkeit des griechischen Reisepasses
im Vergleich zum griechischen Personalausweis. Letzterer wird handschriftlich ausgefüllt, ist
nicht maschinenlesbar und zudem in kyrillischer Schrift (meine Kommentar:also in Griechenland seit 3000 Jahren und immer noch benutzt man nur die griechische Alphabet und nicht kyrillisch) ausgestellt. Der Reisepass ist dagegen maschinenlesbar und wird maschinell ausgestellt, so dass er sich in der Kontrollsituation als
Dokument darstellt, das sehr gut zu handhaben ist. Es ist bedauerlich, dass bei Ihnen der Ein-
druck entstanden ist, Sie seien zu Unrecht kontrolliert oder durch die Beamten der Bundespolizei
nicht respektvoll behandelt worden. Jedoch kann ich nach Überprüfung des Sachverhaltes nicht
erkennen, dass die beteiligten Beamten sich abfällig oder beleidigend verhalten haben.
Ich möchte Sie in diesem Zusammenhang darauf hinweisen, dass die Bundespolizei am
Flughafen Stuttgart aufgrund der oben genannten Erkenntnislage zu unerlaubten Einreisen im Binnenflugverkehr aus Griechenland auch zukünftig entsprechende Kontrollen auf den von Ihnen frequentierten Flugrouten von Griechenland nach Deutschland durchführen wird, da dies aus Gründen der öffentlichen Sicherheit erforderlich ist. Auch wenn die Kontrollen für Sie unangenehm sein mögen, so bitte ich Sie dennoch, die entsprechenden polizeilichen Maßnahmen nicht dadurch in die Länge zu ziehen, indem Sie diese kontinuierlich in Frage stellen.
Ich hoffe, dass ich Ihnen die Gründe und Rechtsgrundlage für die Kontrollmaßnahmen am
Flughafen zu Ihrer Zufriedenheit darlegen konnte.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
In Vertretung
Saturday, September 14, 2019
Schande! Deutschland( Firma Telekom) legalisiert die Ethnische Säuberung und Besetzung Zyperns von der Türkei!
Schande! Deutschland( Firma Telekom) legalisiert die Ethnische Säuberung und Besetzung Zyperns von der Türkei!
Quelle t-online
Zypern ist seit einem von der damaligen Militärjunta in Griechenland unterstützten Putsch und einer anschließenden türkischen Militärintervention im Jahr 1974 geteilt. Die 1983 ausgerufene Türkische Republik Nordzypern wird nur von Ankara anerkannt. Die Schutzmacht Türkei ist dort weiterhin militärisch präsent.
Quelle t-online
Vorfall auf Militärbasis
Explosionen auf Zypern – Hotel in der Nähe evakuiert
13.09.2019, 09:23 Uhr | AFP
Schwere Schäden: Auf einem Militärgelände auf Zypern hat es heftige Explosionen gegeben. (Quelle: Reuters)
In der Nacht zu Freitag haben mehrere Explosionen in einem türkischen Waffenlager eine Urlaubsregion in Nordzypern erschüttert. Zwölf Menschen wurden verletzt.
Bei einer nächtlichen Explosionsserie auf einer türkischen Militärbasis in Nordzypern sind zwölf Menschen verletzt und ein nahe gelegenes Strandhotel beschädigt worden. Wie die Behörden mitteilten, ereigneten sich in der Nacht zum Donnerstag innerhalb von drei Stunden mehrere Explosionen in einem Waffenlager des Stützpunktes westlich des Küstenorts Kyrenia.
Die Explosionen lösten einen Brand aus. Fenster des Hotels "Acapulco" wurden den Angaben zufolge zerstört und Decken stürzten ein. Verängstigte Touristen seien von Einsatzkräften in Sicherheit gebracht worden, hieß es weiter. Die Ursache der Explosionsserie war zunächst unklar, es wurden Ermittlungen eingeleitet.
- Feuerball gesichtet: Meteorit über Norddeutschland
- 400 Jahre altes Haus: Menschenknochen gefunden
Zypern ist seit einem von der damaligen Militärjunta in Griechenland unterstützten Putsch und einer anschließenden türkischen Militärintervention im Jahr 1974 geteilt. Die 1983 ausgerufene Türkische Republik Nordzypern wird nur von Ankara anerkannt. Die Schutzmacht Türkei ist dort weiterhin militärisch präsent.
Verwendete Quellen:
- Nachrichtenagentur AFP
MEISTGELESEN
- 1.Feuerball und lauter KnallOffenbar raste ein Meteorit über Norddeutschland
- 2.56 – na, und!?Demi Moore zieht für Magazincover komplett blank
- 3.PSD2Betrüger nutzen neue EU-Richtlinie für Phishing
- 4.Brexit im NewsblogJuncker nennt Brexit "Höhepunkt einer kontinentalen Tragödie"
- 5.21 Jahre alter VermisstenfallSchaurige Entdeckung auf Google Earth
Thursday, September 12, 2019
Reichenbach Baden-Württemberg, Friedhof ermoderter Zwangsarbeiter-Sklaven, Frauen, Kinder, Säuglinge von Sowjetunion in unverschämtem Zustand, keine Anzeige oder Gedenktafel
Grabstätte für 26 ermordete sowjetische Zwangsarbeiter, darunter auch Frauen,Kinder und Säuglingen . Opfer aus dem "Russenlager" Filsstraße (1600 Zwangsarbeiter aus Sowjetunion). Opfer des deutschen Imperialismus Opfer der barbarischen deutschen Ostpolitik
Es gibt nicht eine einzige Anzeige oder Gedenktafel vor Ort, dass es um ein Friedhof ermoderter Sklaven, Kinder und Säuglinge von Sowjetunion in Reichbach geht. Keine Info! Der Zustand des Friedhofs ist auch richtig unverschämt.
Es gibt sogar Graben von Säuglingen ermordert durch die deutschen. Die exteminierten Sowjetunionbürger haben als Sklaven in der Bahn gearbeitet.
Das ist echt eine Schande, wie das Friedhof gar nicht gepflegt wird und informationslos ist. Stattdessen gibt es ohne Ende Informationen und schöne Blumen vor jedem Denkmal für die sogenannten " Vertriebenen", die nix anderes als phanatische verbrecherische NSDAP Anhänger und Nachfolger der Exterminierung der Westslawen und neue Siedler slawischen Ländern sind. Stattdessen hört man ständig in Deutschland, wie grausam die "Gefangenschaft in Russland" war. Gab es aber in Sowejtunion ein einzigen Friedhof ermoderter Zwangsarbeiter-Sklaven, Frauen, Kinder, Säuglinge von Deutschland? Nein natürlich nicht. Es gab keine Zwangsarbeit von Zivilisten Frauen und Kinder, keine systematische Ermordung von Säuglingen und keine Russifizierung! Und das ist der Punkt.
Deutschland schämt dich, Reichenbach schämt dich, baden wurttemberg schämt dich!
Nie wieder Krieg, nie wieder Polenlager, nie wieder Russenlagernie wieder Operation Barbarossa, nie wieder Auschwitz, nie wieder Maidanek, nie wieder NATO-Angriff auf Jugoslawien, nie wieder Dombass-Krieg, nie wieder finanzieller Krieg in Griechenland-Zypern, nie wieder Angriff in Lybien, .................
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ostarbeiter#Ostarbeitersparen
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ausl%C3%A4nderkinder-Pflegest%C3%A4tte
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entbindungslager_f%C3%BCr_Kinder_von_Ostarbeiterinnen
https://www.esslinger-zeitung.de/region/kreis_artikel,-russenfriedhof-ohne-gedenktafel-_arid,1241824.html
http://www.sowjetische-memoriale.de/index.cfm?inhalt=detail&lang=de&id=11950
https://www.esslinger-zeitung.de/region/kreis_artikel,-gedenkstaette-fuer-zwangsarbeiter-auf-dem-friedhof-_arid,2041446.html
Thursday, September 5, 2019
Ursula von der Leyen: Opening Statement in the European Parliament Plenary . Es lebe Europa, vive l’Europe, long live Europe. no comment
Opening Statementin the European Parliament Plenary SessionAs deliveredUrsula von der LeyenCandidate for President of the European CommissionStrasbourg16 July 2019
Ich bin Europäerin gewesen, bevor ich später gelernt habe, dass ich Deutsche bin und Niedersächsin. Und deshalb gibt es für mich nur eines: Europa einen und stärken.
Europas Versprechen Herr Präsident, Mein Vater war 15 Jahre alt, als der schaurige Krieg, durch den mein Land Tod, Verwüstung, Vertreibung und Zerstörung über unseren Kontinent gebracht hat, endete.
The cornerstone of our collective defence will always be NATO. We will stay transatlantic but we have to become more European.
A responsible leader in the world Honourable Members, As a Defence Minister, I have been many times in this war-torn neighbourhood. I will never forget the words of former President of Iraq Masoum, who said: We want to see more Europe here. The world is calling for more Europe. The world needs more Europe. I believe Europe should have a stronger and more united voice in the world – and it needs to act fast. That is why we must have the courage to take foreign policy decisions by qualified majority. And to stand united behind them. The cornerstone of our collective defence will always be NATO. We will stay transatlantic and we have to become more European. This is why we created the European Defence Union. Our work for our European Union of security and defence is embedded in comprehensive security. Stabilisation always comes with diplomacy, reconciliation and reconstruction. Our servicemen and servicewomen work side by side with police officers, diplomats and development aid workers. These men and women deserve our utmost respect and recognition for their tireless service for Europe.
I would like to tell you a story about perspective. Four years ago, I was lucky enough to welcome a 19-year old refugee from Syria into my home and my family. He spoke no German and was deeply scarred by his experience of civil war and flight. Today, 4 years later, he is fluent in German, English and Arabic. He is a community leader by day, in vocational training and a student for his high school degree by night. He is an inspiration for us all. One day, he wants to go home
Defending Europe’s values Honourable Members, The cradle of our European civilisation is Greek philosophy and Roman Law. And our European continent went through its darkest period when we were ruled by dictators and Rule of Law was banished. For centuries, Europeans fought so hard for their liberty and independence. The Rule of Law is our best tool to defend these freedoms and to protect the most vulnerable in our Union. This is why there can be no compromise when it comes to respecting the Rule of Law. There never will be. I will ensure that we use our full and comprehensive toolbox at European level. In addition, I fully support an EU-wide Rule of Law Mechanism. To be clear: the new instrument is not an alternative to the existing instruments, but an additional one. The Commission will always be an independent guardian of the Treaties. Lady Justice is blind – she will defend the Rule of Law wherever it is attacked. *** Honourable Members, The Rule of Law is universal. It applies to all. In the last five years, more than 17,000 people have drowned in the Mediterranean, which has become one of the deadliest borders in the world. At sea there is the duty to save lives and in our Treaties and conventions there is the legal and moral duty to respect the dignity of every human being. The European Union can and must defend these values. The European Union needs humane borders. We must save, but saving alone is not enough. We must reduce irregular migration, we must fight smugglers and traffickers – it is organised crime –, we must preserve the right to asylum and improve the situation of refugees, for example through humanitarian corridors in close cooperation with the UNHCR. We need empathy and decisive action. I am aware of how difficult and divisive discussions on this issue are. We need to address the legitimate concerns of many and look at how we can overcome our differences. I will propose a New Pact on Migration and Asylum, including the relaunch of the Dublin reform. This will allow us to return to a fully functioning Schengen Area of free movement, the key driver of our prosperity, security and freedoms. A centrepiece in this ambition is a reinforced European Border and Coast Guard Agency. We need to reach a standing corps of 10,000 Frontex border guards not by 2027, but way earlier, at least by 2024. We have to modernise our asylum system. A Common European Asylum System must be exactly that – common. We can only have stable external borders if we Ursula von der Leyen – Candidate for the European Commission President 8 The cornerstone of our collective defence will always be NATO. We will stay transatlantic but we have to become more European. give enough help to Member States facing the most pressure because of where they are on the map. We need solidarity. We all need to help each other and contribute. We need a new way of burden-sharing. And we must make fair cooperation offers to countries of origin and transit which are in the interests of both sides. Diplomacy, economic development, investment, stability and security are needed so that people have a perspective. I would like to tell you a story about perspective. Four years ago, I was lucky enough to welcome a 19-year old refugee from Syria into my home and my family. He spoke no German and was deeply scarred by his experience of civil war and flight. Today, 4 years later, he is fluent in German, English and Arabic. He is a community leader by day, in vocational training and a student for his high school degree by night. He is an inspiration for us all. One day, he wants to go home.
A new push for European democracy Honourable Members, When I came to Strasbourg 13 days ago, I promised I’d come to listen. I have heard your concerns, your hopes and your expectations. The Political Guidelines which I will send you today reflect our discussions. From what I have heard, I have drawn my conclusions and I have made my decisions. First, I want European citizens to play a leading and active part in building the future of our Union. I want them to have their say at a Conference on the Future of Europe, to start in 2020 and run for two years. Second, I want us to work together to improve the Spitzenkandidaten system. We need to make it more visible to the wider electorate and we need to address the issue of transnational lists at the European elections as a complementary tool of European democracy. And third – yes, I support a right of initiative for the European Parliament. When this House, acting by majority of its Members, adopts Resolutions requesting the Commission to submit legislative proposals, I commit to responding with a legislative act in full respect of the proportionality, subsidiarity, and better law-making principles. I am convinced that our stronger partnership will further help to make people’s voices heard.
Ich bin Europäerin gewesen, bevor ich später gelernt habe, dass ich Deutsche bin und Niedersächsin. Und deshalb gibt es für mich nur eines: Europa einen und stärken.
Europas Versprechen Herr Präsident, Mein Vater war 15 Jahre alt, als der schaurige Krieg, durch den mein Land Tod, Verwüstung, Vertreibung und Zerstörung über unseren Kontinent gebracht hat, endete.
The cornerstone of our collective defence will always be NATO. We will stay transatlantic but we have to become more European.
A responsible leader in the world Honourable Members, As a Defence Minister, I have been many times in this war-torn neighbourhood. I will never forget the words of former President of Iraq Masoum, who said: We want to see more Europe here. The world is calling for more Europe. The world needs more Europe. I believe Europe should have a stronger and more united voice in the world – and it needs to act fast. That is why we must have the courage to take foreign policy decisions by qualified majority. And to stand united behind them. The cornerstone of our collective defence will always be NATO. We will stay transatlantic and we have to become more European. This is why we created the European Defence Union. Our work for our European Union of security and defence is embedded in comprehensive security. Stabilisation always comes with diplomacy, reconciliation and reconstruction. Our servicemen and servicewomen work side by side with police officers, diplomats and development aid workers. These men and women deserve our utmost respect and recognition for their tireless service for Europe.
I would like to tell you a story about perspective. Four years ago, I was lucky enough to welcome a 19-year old refugee from Syria into my home and my family. He spoke no German and was deeply scarred by his experience of civil war and flight. Today, 4 years later, he is fluent in German, English and Arabic. He is a community leader by day, in vocational training and a student for his high school degree by night. He is an inspiration for us all. One day, he wants to go home
Defending Europe’s values Honourable Members, The cradle of our European civilisation is Greek philosophy and Roman Law. And our European continent went through its darkest period when we were ruled by dictators and Rule of Law was banished. For centuries, Europeans fought so hard for their liberty and independence. The Rule of Law is our best tool to defend these freedoms and to protect the most vulnerable in our Union. This is why there can be no compromise when it comes to respecting the Rule of Law. There never will be. I will ensure that we use our full and comprehensive toolbox at European level. In addition, I fully support an EU-wide Rule of Law Mechanism. To be clear: the new instrument is not an alternative to the existing instruments, but an additional one. The Commission will always be an independent guardian of the Treaties. Lady Justice is blind – she will defend the Rule of Law wherever it is attacked. *** Honourable Members, The Rule of Law is universal. It applies to all. In the last five years, more than 17,000 people have drowned in the Mediterranean, which has become one of the deadliest borders in the world. At sea there is the duty to save lives and in our Treaties and conventions there is the legal and moral duty to respect the dignity of every human being. The European Union can and must defend these values. The European Union needs humane borders. We must save, but saving alone is not enough. We must reduce irregular migration, we must fight smugglers and traffickers – it is organised crime –, we must preserve the right to asylum and improve the situation of refugees, for example through humanitarian corridors in close cooperation with the UNHCR. We need empathy and decisive action. I am aware of how difficult and divisive discussions on this issue are. We need to address the legitimate concerns of many and look at how we can overcome our differences. I will propose a New Pact on Migration and Asylum, including the relaunch of the Dublin reform. This will allow us to return to a fully functioning Schengen Area of free movement, the key driver of our prosperity, security and freedoms. A centrepiece in this ambition is a reinforced European Border and Coast Guard Agency. We need to reach a standing corps of 10,000 Frontex border guards not by 2027, but way earlier, at least by 2024. We have to modernise our asylum system. A Common European Asylum System must be exactly that – common. We can only have stable external borders if we Ursula von der Leyen – Candidate for the European Commission President 8 The cornerstone of our collective defence will always be NATO. We will stay transatlantic but we have to become more European. give enough help to Member States facing the most pressure because of where they are on the map. We need solidarity. We all need to help each other and contribute. We need a new way of burden-sharing. And we must make fair cooperation offers to countries of origin and transit which are in the interests of both sides. Diplomacy, economic development, investment, stability and security are needed so that people have a perspective. I would like to tell you a story about perspective. Four years ago, I was lucky enough to welcome a 19-year old refugee from Syria into my home and my family. He spoke no German and was deeply scarred by his experience of civil war and flight. Today, 4 years later, he is fluent in German, English and Arabic. He is a community leader by day, in vocational training and a student for his high school degree by night. He is an inspiration for us all. One day, he wants to go home.
A new push for European democracy Honourable Members, When I came to Strasbourg 13 days ago, I promised I’d come to listen. I have heard your concerns, your hopes and your expectations. The Political Guidelines which I will send you today reflect our discussions. From what I have heard, I have drawn my conclusions and I have made my decisions. First, I want European citizens to play a leading and active part in building the future of our Union. I want them to have their say at a Conference on the Future of Europe, to start in 2020 and run for two years. Second, I want us to work together to improve the Spitzenkandidaten system. We need to make it more visible to the wider electorate and we need to address the issue of transnational lists at the European elections as a complementary tool of European democracy. And third – yes, I support a right of initiative for the European Parliament. When this House, acting by majority of its Members, adopts Resolutions requesting the Commission to submit legislative proposals, I commit to responding with a legislative act in full respect of the proportionality, subsidiarity, and better law-making principles. I am convinced that our stronger partnership will further help to make people’s voices heard.
Sunday, September 1, 2019
80 years after second World War caused by the german Imperialism. Never forget the huge German Crimes in Poland
Today 80 years after second world war all most everebody in Germany still believes that Gdańsk and all the West Poland and Kaliningrad and Czechia belong to Germany. Yes that is the truth , the German imperialism still exists and is the official state policy despite the History and the mass murdere People of Poland Soviet Union and Czechoslovakia.
Never again Auswitz never again Maidanek never again Generplanost never again Polenlage and Russenlage never again Nato bombing of Yugoslavia never again financial war in Greece never again war in Ukraine.
Death to Fascism and Germanism. Freedom for the People
Commissioned in 1979 in the People's Republic of Poland by the Polish Communications Ministry and the Council for the Protection of Monuments of Battle and Martyrdom, and unveiled on September 1 of the same year, the stainless steel Defenders of the Polish Post Monument was designed by the Kraków-based sculptor Wincenty Kućma. A wonderful example of Socialist Art and a fitting tribute to the heroes who put up such a brave struggle next door, the monument represents a dying Polish post employee who is being handed a rifle by Nike.
The Defence of the Polish Post Office in Gdańsk was the first heroic act of World War II.
On September 1, 1939, Polish personnel defended the building for some 15 hours against assaults by the SS Heimwehr Danzig (SS Danzig Home Defense), local SA formations and special units of Danzig police. All but four of the defenders, who were able to escape from the building during the surrender, were sentenced to death by a German court martial as illegal combatants on October 5, 1939 and executed.
In the Polish Post Office complex on 1 September 1939 there were 56 people: Guderski, 42 local Polish employees, ten employees from Gdynia and Bydgoszcz, and the building keeper with his wife and ten-year-old daughter who lived in the complex.
The German attack plan, devised in July 1939, determined that the main building and its defenders would be stormed from two directions.
At 04:00 the Germans cut the phone and electricity lines to the building. At 04:45, just as the German battleship Schleswig-Holstein started shelling the nearby Polish Army military outpost at Westerplatte, the Danzig police began their assault on the building under the command of Polizeioberst Willi Bethke. They were soon reinforced by local SA formations and the SS units SS Wachsturmbann "E" and SS Heimwehr Danzig, supported by three police ADGZ heavy armoured cars. Albert Forster, head of the local Nazi party, arrived in one of the vehicles to watch the event. Journalists from local newspapers, Reichssender Danzig (the state radio station), and the newsreel company Ufa-Tonwache also came to cover the battle.
At 11:00 German units were reinforced by the Wehrmacht with two 75 mm artillery pieces and a 105 mm howitzer, but the renewed assault, even with the artillery support, was again repulsed. Mortar support was requested from the German forces at Westerplatte, but its inaccurate fire posed a greater threat to the attackers and it soon ceased action.[4] At 15:00 the Germans declared a two-hour ceasefire and demanded that the Polish forces surrender, which they refused. In the meantime, a unit of sappers dug under the walls of the building and prepared a 600 kg explosive device. At 17:00 the bomb was set off, collapsing part of the wall, and German forces under the cover of three artillery pieces attacked again, this time capturing most of the building except the basement.
Frustrated by the Poles' refusal to surrender, Bethke requested a rail car full of gasoline. Danzig's fire department pumped it into the basement, and it was then ignited by a hand grenade. After three Poles were burned alive (bringing the total Polish casualties to six killed in action), the rest decided to capitulate. The first two people to leave the building, director Dr. Jan Michoń, carrying a white flag, and commandant Józef Wąsik, were shot by the Germans. The rest of the Poles were allowed to surrender and leave the burning building. Six people managed to escape from the building, although two of them were captured the following days.
Sixteen wounded prisoners were sent to the Gestapo hospital, where six subsequently died (including the 10-year-old Erwina). The other 28 were first imprisoned in the police building and, after a few days, sent to Victoriaschule, where they were interrogated and tortured. Some 300 to 400 Polish citizens of Danzig were also held there.
All the prisoners were put on trial in front of the martial court of the Wehrmacht's Gruppe Eberhardt. A first group of 28 Victoriaschule-prisoners, with a single Wehrmacht officer as defence lawyer, was tried on 8 September, a second group of 10, who recovered in the hospital, on 30 September. All were sentenced to death as illegal combatants under the German special military penal law of 1938.
The prisoners were mostly executed by firing squad led by SS-Sturmbannführer Max Pauly (later commandant of the Neuengamme concentration camp) on 5 October and buried in a mass grave at the cemetery of Danzig-Saspe (Zaspa)
The sentence was demanded by the prosecutor Hans Giesecke and declared by presiding judge Kurt Bode, Vice-President of the Oberlandesgericht Danzig (Higher Regional Court of Danzig).
Giesecke and Bode were never held responsible for this episode or held accountable for the executions. They were denazified after the war and continued their careers as lawyers in Germany. Both died of natural causes in the 1970s.
Gdańsk was liberated from Germany by the Polish People's and Soviet Army on 30 March 1945. The Polish People's Republic made this Monument on December 28, 1969 .
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Monument to the Polishness of Gdańsk - a monument commemorating those killed for the Polishness of Gdańsk in the period from the Gdansk slaughter in 1308 to the end of World War II , unveiled on December 28, 1969 from the Polish People's Republic on the square at Podwale Staromiejskie Street . The monument in the shape of concrete blocks decorated with reliefs symbolizing an ax embedded in the ground , was built according to the vision of Wawrzyniec Samp and Wiesław Pietronia.
In May 2008, on the initiative of the Polish Community of Gdańsk and the Society of Friends of Gdańsk , a memorial plaque was unveiled :
"The memory of Gdańsk Poles who died for the Polishness of Gdańsk in German prisons, concentration camps and other places of execution in 1939-1945."
Under the plaque there is a fragment from Song XII of Jan Kochanowski written in golden letters :
"And if anyone has an open road to Heaven - What serves the homeland."
The city of Danzig (Gdańsk) was captured by the State of the Teutonic Order on 13 November 1308 marking the beginning of tensions between Poland and the Teutonic Order. Originally the knights moved into the fortress as an ally of Poland against the Margraviate of Brandenburg. However, after disputes over the control of the city between the Order and the King of Poland arose, the knights murdered a number of citizens within the city and took it as their own. Thus the event is also known as Gdańsk massacre or Gdańsk slaughter (rzeź Gdańska). Though in the past, a matter of debate among historians, a consensus has been established that many people were murdered and a considerable part of the town was destroyed in the context of the take-over.
A Song of the Soldiers of Westerplatte (Polish poet Konstanty Ildefons Gałczyński )
When their days had been filled
and it was time to die in the summer,
They went straight to heaven in a coach-and-four,
the soldiers of Westerplatte.
(Summer was beautiful that year.)
They sang: "Ah, it´s nothing
that our wounds were so painful,
for now it is sweet to walk
the heavenly fields."
(On earth that year there was plenty of heather for bouquets.)
In Gdansk we stood like a wall
in defiance of the German offensive,
now we soar among the clouds,
we soldiers of Westerplatte.
Those with keen sense of sight
and sound are said to have heard
in the clouds the measured step
of the Maratime Batallion.
This was the song they heard: "We'll
take advantage of the sunshine
and bask in the warm days
in the heather fields of paradise.
But when the cold wind blows
and sorrow courses the earth,
We'll float down to the center of Warsaw,
The soldiers of Westerplatte."
--------------------------------------------
The Battle of Westerplatte was the first battle in the Invasion of Poland and marked the start of the Second World War in Europe. Beginning on September 1, 1939, German naval forces and soldiers and Danzig police assaulted the Polish Military Transit Depot (Wojskowa Składnica Tranzytowa, or WST) on the peninsula of Westerplatte, in the harbour of the Free City of Danzig. The Poles held out for seven days in the face of a heavy attack that included dive bomber attacks.
The defense of Westerplatte served as an inspiration for the Polish Army and people in the face of successful German advances elsewhere, and today is still regarded as a symbol of resistance to the invasion.
-------------------------------------------
The construction of the work was initiated by the Council for the Protection of Memory of Combat and Martyrdom in the great time of the Polish People's Republic between 1964 and 1966.
Decorated with reliefs and inscriptions commemorating the heroic defense of the Polish coast in 1939, with names of water-battles and places of naval battles of the Second World War , in which Polish sailors and soldiers participated, but also places of battles at Lenino and Studzianki , with the inscription "Glory to the liberators" and figures of a sailor and soldier with soviet weapons (pesce) placed on top. Seven candles at the feet refer to the 7 days of Westerplatte defense . According to these explanations, the monument is to symbolize a sword or bayonet with a hilt in the ground.
Museum of Martyrdom of the Zamość Region - Rotunda in Poland.
It was established in 1947 , the Museum of Martyrdom of the Zamość Region - Rotunda here, in the time of Socialism after the Liberation of Zamosc from Nazi Germany by soldiers of the Soviet Union, polish People's Army and Partisans (Armia Ludowa and Home Army).
That was how Polish People's Republic honored the liberators and the victims of Nazi Germany.
All liberators and soldiers of the Soviet Union, polish People's Army and Partisans (Armia Ludowa and Home Army), all victims Soviets, Poles, Polish Jews. All of them!
During World War II, Germans created here a temporary camp for the arrested population, among others groups of intelligence, people connected with the resistance movement . Later, in 1942 , this object was also a place of numerous mass executions, which included until 1943 the population of the Zamość region , including children. As in many other places, the Germans here also covered the traces of their crimes; the ashes of the burned victims were thrown into the moat of the river around Rotunda. It is estimated that about 8,000 people were killed here.
After the end of hostilities and the liberation of the city from German occupation in 1944, a graveyard was created with graves of Rotunda's victims around its walls outside and graves of other victims on both sides of the road leading from the north to its courtyard (ordered in the mid-1950s) : soldiers of the Home Army , Soviet partisans and soldiers of the Red Army , as well as civilians, among others Jews . There are many nameless and symbolic tombs, you can also see collective graves, but commemorating the tragic events.
At the entrance to the courtyard there is a gate with German inscriptions "Gefangenen Durchgangslager Sicherheitspol" ("Jenciecowy Transitional Security Police Camp"), and just behind her on the left, in place of a destroyed cell, a plate commemorating the execution and executions of local prisoners.
Inside, individual targets were devoted to various victims of World War II, not only from the Zamość region, among others there are: Wołyniak's Cell [1] , Scouts' Cell, Cell of Prisoners of Majdanek , Cell of Prisoners of Auschwitz , Teacher's Cell, and many more.
There is a large commemorative plaque in the courtyard - the bodies of the murdered burned in this place. The last prisoners were murdered just before the escape, their bodies burned only partially and are buried around.
Thursday, August 22, 2019
Gdańsk, massacred by Germany and liberated from Germany by the Polish People's and Soviet Army on 30 March 1945
Following the annexation of Austria and the Sudetenland, Germany in October 1938 urged the Gdańsk territory's cession to Germany. On September 1, 1939, Nazi Germany invaded Poland, initiating World War II.
On September 2, 1939 Germany officially annexed the Free City. The Nazi regime murdered the Polish postmen defending the Polish Post Office: this was one of the first war crimes during the war. Other Polish soldiers defending the Westerplatte stronghold surrendered after seven days of fighting. The German commander returned the sword to the Polish commander for putting up a brave fight, while the same time one the captured defenders, Kazimierz Rasinski was brutally tortured by Germans and murdered when he refused to reveal Polish communication codes. On Sep 7th NSDAP organised night parade on Adolf-Hitlerstrasse to celebrate success. It was bombed by a single Polish hydroplane operating from Hela peninsula piloted by Jozef Rudzki and Zdzisław Juszczakiewicz. Six bombs each weighing 12.5 kg (28 lb) were dropped from very low height. In October 1939, Gdańsk, together with the prewar Pomeranian Voivodship to the south and west, became the German Reichsgau (administrative district) of Danzig-West Prussia (Danzig–Westpreussen). With the start of the war the Nazi regime began its policy of extermination in Pomerania; Poles, Kashubians and Jews and the political opposition were sent to concentration camps, especially neighbouring Stutthof where 85,000 victims perished. Kashubian and Polish intelligentsia were killed in the Piaśnica mass murder site, which is estimated to have had 60,000 victims.
Tuesday, August 20, 2019
Frederick the -Great- Imperialist and Racist, the absolut antipolish, antisemit and antislav Tyrann. The man who destroyed the Polish Lithuanian Commonwealth
_-_Google_Art_Project.jpg)
Frederick had despised the Poles since his youth, and numerous statements are known in which he expressed anti-Polish prejudice,[63] calling Polish society "stupid" and stating that "all these people with surnames ending with -ski, deserve only contempt".[64] He passionately hated everything associated with Poland, while justifying his hatred and territorial expansion with ideas of the Enlightenment.[65] He described Poles as "slovenly Polish trash";[66][c] referring to them in a letter from 1735 as "dirty" and "vile apes",[67] and compared the Polish peasants to American Indians.[68]
Frederick undertook the conquest of Polish territory under the pretext of an enlightened civilizing mission, given his disparagement of Poland and its ruling elite, all of which provided a convenient entree for the "sanguine meliorism" of the Enlightenment and heightened assurance in the "distinctive merits of the 'Prussian way'".[69][70] He prepared the ground for the partition of Poland-Lithuania in 1752 at latest, hoping to gain a territorial bridge between Pomerania, Brandenburg, and his East Prussian provinces.[71] Frederick was himself partly responsible for the weakness of the Polish government, having inflated its currency by his use of Polish coin dies obtained during the conquest of Saxony in 1756: the profits exceeded 25 million thalers, twice the peacetime national budget of Prussia.[72][73] He opposed attempts of political reform in Poland, and his troops bombarded customs ports on the Vistula, thwarting Polish efforts to create a modern fiscal system.[74] As early as 1731 Frederick had suggested that his country would benefit from annexing Polish Prussia in order to join the separated territories his own kingdom.[75]
According to Scott, Frederick was eager to exploit Poland economically as part of his wider aim of enriching Prussia. Scott views this as a continuation of his previous violations of Polish territory in 1759 and 1761 and raids within Greater Poland until 1765.
Lewitter says: "The conflict over the rights of religious dissenters [in Poland] had led to civil war and foreign intervention." Out of 11–12 million people in Poland, 200,000 were Protestants and 600,000 Eastern Orthodox. The Protestant dissidents were still free to practice their religion, although their schools were shut down.[76] All dissidents could own property, but Poland increasingly reduced their civic rights after a period of considerable religious and political freedoms.[77] They were allowed to serve in the army and vote in elections, but were barred from public offices and the Polish Parliament (Sejm), and during the 1760s their importance became out of proportion compared to their numbers.[78]Frederick exploited this conflict as means to keep Poland weak and divided.[79]
Empress Catherine II of Russia was staunchly opposed to Prussia, and in response Frederick opposed Russia, whose troops had been allowed to freely cross the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth during the Seven Years' War of 1756–63. Despite their personal hostility, Frederick and Catherine signed a defensive alliance in 1764 that guaranteed Prussian control of Silesia in return for Prussian support for Russia against Austria or the Ottoman Empire. Catherine's candidate for the Polish throne, Stanisław August Poniatowski, was then elected King of Poland in September of that year, and she gained control of Polish politics.
Frederick became concerned, however, after Russia gained significant influence over Poland in the Repnin Sejm of 1767, a position which also threatened Austria and the Ottoman Turks. In the ensuing Russo-Turkish War (1768–74), Frederick supported Catherine with a subsidy of 300,000 rubles, albeit with reluctance as he did not want Russia to become even stronger through acquisitions of Ottoman territory. The Prussian king achieved a rapprochement with the Austrian Emperor Joseph and chancellor Kaunitz.
After Russia occupied the Danubian Principalities in 1769–70, Frederick's representative in Saint Petersburg, his brother Prince Henry, convinced Frederick and Maria Theresa that the balance of power would be maintained by a tripartite division of the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth instead of Russia taking land from the Ottomans. They agreed to the First Partition of Poland in 1772, which took place without war. Frederick claimed most of the Polish province of Royal Prussia. Prussia annexed 20,000 square miles (52,000 km2) and 600,000 inhabitants, the least of the partitioning powers.[80] However, Prussia's Polish territory was also the best-developed economically. The newly created province of West Prussia connected East Prussia and Farther Pomerania and granted Prussia control of the mouth of the Vistula River. Frederick also invited German immigrants to the province,[81] hoping they would displace the Poles.[82] Maria Theresa had only reluctantly agreed to the partition, to which Frederick sarcastically commented, "she cries, but she takes".[68]
Frederick himself tried further propaganda to justify the Partition, portraying the acquired provinces as underdeveloped and improved by Prussian rule. According to Karin Friedrichthese claims were accepted for a long time in German historiography and sometimes still reflected in modern works.[83] Frederick did not justify his conquests on an ethnic basis, however, unlike later nationalist, 19th-century German historians. Dismissive of contemporary German culture, Frederick instead pursued an imperialist policy, acting on the security interests of his state.[84] Frederick II settled 300,000 colonists in territories he had conquered, and enforced Germanization.[85]
After the first partition Frederick engaged in plunder of Polish property, confiscating Polish estates and monasteries to support German colonization, and in 1786 he ordered forced buy-outs of Polish holdings.[86] The new strict tax system and bureaucracy was particularly disliked among the Polish population, as was the compulsory military service in the army, which didn't exist previously in Poland.[87] Frederick abolished the gentry's freedom from taxation and restricted its power.[88] Royal estates formerly belonging to the Polish Crown were redistributed to German landowners, reinforcing Germanization.[89] Both Protestant and Roman Catholic teachers (mostly Jesuits) taught in West Prussia, and teachers and administrators were encouraged to be able to speak both German and Polish.[81] Economic exploitation of Poland, especially by Prussia and Austria, followed the territorial seizures.
Frederick looked upon many of his new Polish citizens with scorn, but carefully concealed that scorn when actually dealing with them. Frederick's long-term goal was to remove all Polish people from his territories, both peasants and nobility. He sought to expel the nobles through an oppressive tax system and the peasantry by eradicating the Polish national character of the rural population by mixing them with Germans invited in their thousands by promises of free land. By such means, Frederick boasted he would "gradually...get rid of all Poles".[90][91]
Frederick wrote that Poland had "the worst government in Europe with the exception of Turkey".[68] After a prolonged visit to West Prussia in 1773, Frederick informed Voltaire of his findings and accomplishments: "I have abolished serfdom, reformed the savage laws, opened a canal which joins up all the main rivers; I have rebuilt those villages razed to the ground after the plague in 1709. I have drained the marshes and established a police force where none existed. ... [I]t is not reasonable that the country which produced Copernicus should be allowed to moulder in the barbarism that results from tyranny. Those hitherto in power have destroyed the schools, thinking that the uneducated people are easily oppressed. These provinces cannot be compared with any European country—the only parallel would be Canada."[92] However, in a letter to his favorite brother, Prince Henry, Frederick admitted that the Polish provinces were economically profitable:
- It is a very good and advantageous acquisition, both from a financial and a political point of view. In order to excite less jealousy I tell everyone that on my travels I have seen just sand, pine trees, heath land and Jews. Despite that there is a lot of work to be done; there is no order, and no planning and the towns are in a lamentable condition.[93]
Frederick also sent in Jesuits to open schools, and befriended Ignacy Krasicki, whom he asked to consecrate St. Hedwig's Cathedral in 1773. He also advised his successors to learn Polish, a policy followed by the Hohenzollern dynasty until Frederick III decided not to let the future William II learn the language.[81]
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)